To determine the correctness of the given statements, let's analyze each one individually based on atomic and ionic radii concepts.
Statement I: The metallic radius of is and the ionic radius of is lesser than .
Analysis: Metallic Radius of Sodium (): Sodium is a metal, and its metallic radius is indeed approximately .
The metallic radius refers to half the distance between the nuclei of two adjacent atoms in a metallic lattice.
Ionic Radius of Sodium Ion (): When sodium loses an electron to form , it loses its outermost electron shell (the 3s orbital).
This results in a significant decrease in size due to: Decrease in Electron-Electron Repulsion: Fewer electrons mean less repulsion among them.
Unchanged Nuclear Charge: The number of protons remains the same, so the effective nuclear charge per electron increases, pulling the remaining electrons closer to the nucleus.
The ionic radius of is approximately , which is significantly smaller than .
Conclusion: Statement I is correct.
Statement II: Ions are always smaller in size than the corresponding elements.
Analysis: General Trends: Cations (): Formed by the loss of one or more electrons.
Result: Cations are smaller than their parent atoms due to loss of electron(s) and decreased electron-electron repulsion.
Example: (size decreases).
Anions (): Formed by the gain of one or more electrons.
Result: Anions are larger than their parent atoms due to added electron(s) and increased electron-electron repulsion.
Example: (size increases).
Exceptions to Statement II: Since anions are larger than their corresponding neutral atoms, the statement that "ions are always smaller in size than the corresponding elements" is incorrect.
Conclusion: Statement II is false.
Final Answer: Statement I is correct but Statement II is false.