Units & Measurements
To calculate the percentage error in the resistivity of the material of the wire, we need to understand the formula for resistivity.
The resistivity of a wire is given by: where:
is the resistance
is the cross-sectional area of the wire
is the length of the wire The cross-sectional area
of the wire with radius
is: We can plug this into the equation for resistivity to get: Now, to find the percentage error in resistivity, we need to find the percentage errors in
,
, and
and then use the following rule for combining errors: For a given function,
, where
are the measured quantities with possible errors, the percentage error in
, denoted as
, can be approximated by adding the relative percentage errors of the input quantities. If
has the form of a product and quotient of the measured quantities as in our case (
), the percentage error in
is given by: Where
,
, and
are the percentage errors in each measured quantity
respectively. For our case: The percentage error in radius
is given by the error in
divided by the average radius and then multiplied by 100: The percentage error in resistance
is: The percentage error in length
is: Now let's calculate each: However, since the area
is proportional to
, the percentage error in
will be twice the percentage error in
.
Thus: Finally, we add the percentage errors to find the percentage error in resistivity: This calculation gives us a value close to 39.91%, which means the correct option is closest to this value.
Thus, the best answer is: Option D
(Here
is Planck's constant,
is angular momentum,
is linear momentum and is moment of force)
The provided statements (A) Assertion and (R) Reason have to be analyzed to determine their correctness and also whether Reason (R) correctly explains Assertion (A).
Assertion (A) is addressing a scenario where a positive zero error occurs in a Vernier caliper.
Positive zero error refers to the condition when the zero mark on the Vernier scale is to the right of the zero mark on the main scale when the jaws of the caliper are completely closed.
In this case, even when measuring a zero length, the Vernier caliper will show a positive reading, indicating an error.
This error is constant and will get added to actual measurements, causing the instrument to give readings that are more than the actual measurement.
So, Assertion (A) is true.
Reason (R) explains the possible causes of zero error in Vernier calipers.
Zero errors can indeed occur due to imperfect manufacturing processes, where the scales are not perfectly aligned.
They can also happen due to rough handling, for instance, if the instrument is dropped, which might cause a permanent deformation leading to a continuous zero error.
Hence, Reason (R) is true as well.
Finally, we need to analyze whether Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Although both statements are correct, the Reason (R) does not explain why a positive zero error would lead to the reading being more than the actual reading, it merely states the possible causes of zero errors.
Therefore, the correct relationship between the statements is that they are both true, but (R) does not provide the correct explanation for (A).
The correct option is : Option B Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
To determine the dimensions of
, let's start by identifying the dimensions of each term in the equation
, where
represents force,
represents distance, and
represents time. The dimension of force (
) is given by [MLT-2], where
is mass,
is length, and
is time. The term
has the same dimension as force, so:
The term
also has the same dimension as force, which gives:
Now, to find
, we substitute the dimensions of
and
:
Therefore, the dimensions of
are
, which corresponds to mass times length cubed per time cubed.
To determine the dimensional formula for Planck's constant, we will start by analyzing the given de-Broglie wavelength equation:
Here, is the wavelength,
is the Planck's constant,
is the mass of the particle, and
is the energy of the particle.
First, let's derive the dimensional formula for each term involved: 1.
Wavelength has the dimensional formula of length
. 2. Mass
has the dimensional formula
. 3. Energy
has the dimensional formula of work, which is force times distance:
. Now, let's rewrite the equation in terms of the dimensions:
Simplifying inside the square root:
Since the constants like 2 do not affect the dimensional formula, we can simplify further:
Cross multiplying to solve for the dimensional formula of
:
Therefore, the dimensional formula for Planck's constant
is:
Hence, the correct option is: Option C
To derive the dimensional formula of latent heat, we need to understand what latent heat actually refers to.
Latent heat is the amount of heat absorbed or released by a substance during a change in its physical state (phase) that occurs without changing its temperature.
The formula for latent heat () is given by: where: = Heat absorbed or released (with the dimension of energy ), = Mass of the substance (), = Latent heat.
To find the dimensions of latent heat, we rearrange the formula to solve for : Knowing the dimensions of (energy, which is equivalent to work done, with dimensions ) and (mass, with dimensions ), we can substitute these into the equation to find 's dimensions: This simplifies to: Therefore, the dimensional formula of latent heat is: So, the correct option is: Option C
The least count of a vernier caliper is defined as the smallest distance that it can measure and is calculated by the difference in length between one main scale division and one vernier scale division.
It can be represented as:
Given that one main scale division is equal to
units and the
division of main scale coincides with the
division of the vernier scale, this means that
divisions on the main scale is equal to
divisions on the vernier scale. Since one main scale division is
units,
divisions on the main scale would be
units. If
divisions on the main scale are equal to
divisions on the vernier scale, we can determine the length of one vernier scale division as
Thus, the least count, which is the difference between one main scale division and one vernier scale division, is:
This simplifies to:
Therefore, the correct option is: Option B:
To determine which of the options is NOT correct, we need to analyze the dimensional consistency of each term in the given equation of the stationary wave:
Let's break down the dimensions for each relevant term: 1. Analyzing
: The argument of the sine function
must be dimensionless. Therefore, the dimensions of
should be the same as the dimensions of (wavelength), which is [L]. Thus, the dimensions of
should be [L]. Hence, Option A is correct. 2. Analyzing
: From the above analysis, since
has the dimension [L] and
(time) has the dimension [T], it follows that:
Hence, Option B is also correct. 3. Analyzing
: In the argument of the cosine function
, since it must be dimensionless, the dimensions of
should be the same as the dimensions of (wavelength), which is [L]. Hence, the dimensions of
should be [L]. Therefore, Option C is correct. 4. Analyzing
: From the dimensions we have determined for
and :
Thus, the dimensions of
should be [T-1], not [T].
This indicates that Option D is NOT correct.
Conclusion: Option D is the correct answer since it is NOT dimensionally correct.