Least count =
= 0.01 mm Zero error = (45 - 50)0.01 mm = - 0.05 mm Thickness of sheet = (0.5 + 250.01) - (-0.05) = 0.50 + 0.30 = 0.80 mm
Least count =
= 0.01 mm Zero error = (45 - 50)0.01 mm = - 0.05 mm Thickness of sheet = (0.5 + 250.01) - (-0.05) = 0.50 + 0.30 = 0.80 mm
In a double slit experiment, the bright spots (maxima) from interference are found where: , where can be 0, ±1, ±2, and so on.
The dark spots (minima) from single slit diffraction appear at: .
For a bright interference fringe to be inside the central bright area of the single slit (central maximum), it must fall between these two first diffraction minima.
This means we need: , or .
The problem says the distance between the slits () is 6.1 times the width of each slit (), so .
The biggest whole number for is 6, so there are maxima for .
If we count only the bright spots on the sides (not the middle one), that's 6 on one side and 6 on the other, making 12 bright maxima.
If the central bright spot () is counted too, there would be 13, but usually “within the central maximum” means only the fringes between the two minima, not the central line.
So, you will see 12 bright interference fringes inside the central maximum of the single slit envelope.
Answer = 12.
(Option C)
Fresh wood: 20 decays/min (current activity if alive / just cut).
Old museum sample: 2 decays/min.
Half-life of C‑14 = 5730 years.
Find the age of wooden piece in museum.
Step 1: Ratio of activities So, the museum sample’s activity is 10% of that in fresh wood.
Step 2: Radioactive decay law So, Step 3: Decay constant Step 4: Solve for ✅ Final Answer: Option C: 19039 years
The smallest detail a microscope can see (its resolution limit) is given by the formula:
Here, N.A. stands for numerical aperture. The formula for numerical aperture is:
where n is the refractive index of the oil (the medium), and α is half the angle made by the cone of light rays coming from the specimen.
The resolving power (RP) of the microscope tells us how well it can see small details.
It is the inverse of the resolution limit:
Now, the angle subtended by the lens diameter at the focal point is β.
From geometry, we see that α (half the cone angle) is related to β by:
This means the resolving power becomes:
So, the microscope will see finer details as the value of increases. Answer: C.
We are tasked with finding the relative refractive index given the relation between the critical angle and the Brewster’s angle.
Step 1: Recall the definitions Critical angle (from denser medium to rarer medium , with ): where is the relative refractive index .
Brewster’s angle: Step 2: Given condition So: Step 3: Relation between and Since , Step 4: Substitute into ratio Given this equals 1.28: Step 5: Solve for Square both sides: Step 6: Find the relative index of the two media in the question’s terms Here we defined .
But the relative refractive index of the two media usually means (rarer/denser), since that's how it appears in options (<1).
✅ Final Answer: Correct Option: C
Measured length of rod = 3.50 cm That means least count of the measuring instrument should be 0.01 cm = 0.1 mm For vernier scale 1 main scale division = 1 mm And 9 MSD = 10 VSD Least count = 1 MSD - 1 VSD = 1 - 0.9 = 0.1 mm
Here t1 = 90 s, t2 = 91 s, t3 = 95 s, t4 = 92 s Mean(t) =
=
= 92 s Now mean deviation =
= 1.5 s Since least count of clock is one second, so reported mean time = (92 2) s
Given, P = a
b2 c3 d4 Relative error =
100 = (
+ 2
+ 3
+ 4
) 100 =
2 + 2 1 + 3 3 + 4 5 = 32%
Surface tension, T =
Relative error,
Percentage error,
= (0.8 + 0.689) = 1.489 % = 1.5 %