Wave Optics

JEE Physics · 98 questions · Page 6 of 10 · Click an option or "Show Solution" to reveal answer

Q51
Two plane polarized light waves combine at a certain point whose electric field components are E1=E0SinωtE2=E0Sin(ωt+π3)\begin{aligned} & E_1=E_0 \operatorname{Sin} \omega t \\ & E_2=E_0 \operatorname{Sin}\left(\omega t+\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \end{aligned} Find the amplitude of the resultant wave.
A 1.7 E01.7 \mathrm{~E}_0
B E0\mathrm{E}_0
C 0.9 E00.9 \mathrm{~E}_0
D 3.4 E03.4 \mathrm{~E}_0
Correct Answer
Option A
Solution

To find the amplitude of the resultant wave for the given electric field components, we use the formula for the resultant amplitude of two combining waves.

These components are: E1=E0sinωt E_1 = E_0 \sin \omega t E2=E0sin(ωt+π3) E_2 = E_0 \sin \left(\omega t + \dfrac{\pi}{3}\right) The general formula for the amplitude E E of two superimposed waves E1 E_1 and E2 E_2 with a phase difference is: E=E12+E22+2E1E2cosϕ E = \sqrt{E_1^2 + E_2^2 + 2E_1E_2 \cos\phi} where ϕ \phi is the phase difference between the two waves.

In this scenario, ϕ=π3 \phi = \dfrac{\pi}{3} .

Substituting the given expressions and phase difference into the formula, we get: E=(E0)2+(E0)2+2(E0)(E0)cos(π3) E = \sqrt{(E_0)^2 + (E_0)^2 + 2(E_0)(E_0)\cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{3}\right)} Given that cos(π3)=12\cos \left( \dfrac{\pi}{3} \right) = \dfrac{1}{2}, this simplifies to: E=2E02+E02=3E0 E = \sqrt{2E_0^2 + E_0^2} = \sqrt{3}E_0 Thus, the amplitude of the resultant wave is 3E01.73E0\sqrt{3}E_0 \approx 1.73E_0.

Q52
Two polarisers P1P_1 and P2P_2 are placed in such a way that the intensity of the transmitted light will be zero. A third polariser P3P_3 is inserted in between P1P_1 and P2P_2, at particular angle between P2P_2 and P3P_3. The transmitted intensity of the light passing the through all three polarisers is maximum. The angle between the polarisers P2P_2 and P3P_3 is :
A π/6\pi / 6
B π3\dfrac{\pi}{3}
C π4\dfrac{\pi}{4}
D π/8\pi / 8
Correct Answer
Option C
Solution

Through P2I1=I0sin2(π2θ)P_2 I_1=I_0 \sin ^2\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-\theta\right)

I1=I0cos2θI_1=I_0 \cos ^2 \theta

Through P3Inet =(I0cos2θ)sin2θP_3 I_{\text{net }}=\left(I_0 \cos ^2 \theta\right) \sin ^2 \theta

Inet =I04[sin(2θ)]2 for max Inet θ=45I_{\text{net }}=\frac{I_0}{4}[\sin (2 \theta)]^2 \text{ for max } I_{\text{net }} \theta=45^{\circ}

So angle between P2\mathrm{P}_2 and P3=π4\mathrm{P}_3=\dfrac{\pi}{4} Correct Ans. (1)

Q53
In a Young's double slit experiment, the slits are separated by 0.2 mm . If the slits separation is increased to 0.4 mm , the percentage change of the fringe width is :
A 25%25 \%
B 50%50 \%
C 0%0 \%
D 100%100 \%
Correct Answer
Option B
Solution

In Young's double slit experiment, the fringe width β\beta is given by:

β=λDd\beta = \frac{\lambda D}{d}

where: λ\lambda is the wavelength of light,

DD

is the distance from the slits to the screen,

dd

is the separation between the slits. Here's how the change affects the fringe width: Initial Situation: When

d=0.2 mmd = 0.2 \text{ mm}

, the fringe width is:

βinitial=λD0.2 mm\beta_{\text{initial}} = \frac{\lambda D}{0.2 \text{ mm}}

After Increasing Slit Separation: When

dd

is increased to

0.4 mm0.4 \text{ mm}

:

βnew=λD0.4 mm\beta_{\text{new}} = \frac{\lambda D}{0.4 \text{ mm}}

Comparing the Two Fringe Widths: Notice that:

βnew=12×λD0.2 mm=12βinitial\beta_{\text{new}} = \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{\lambda D}{0.2 \text{ mm}} = \frac{1}{2} \beta_{\text{initial}}

This means the fringe width is halved, which is a reduction of

50%50\%

. Thus, the fringe width decreases by

50%50\%

when the slit separation is increased from

0.2 mm0.2 \text{ mm}

to

0.4 mm0.4 \text{ mm}

. The correct answer is Option B:

50%50\%

.

Q54
Width of one of the two slits in a Young's double slit interference experiment is half of the other slit. The ratio of the maximum to the minimum intensity in the interference pattern is :
A 3:13: 1
B (22+1):(221)(2 \sqrt{2}+1):(2 \sqrt{2}-1)
C 9:19: 1
D (3+22):(322)(3+2 \sqrt{2}):(3-2 \sqrt{2})
Correct Answer
Option D
Solution

In Young's double-slit interference experiment, the width of one slit is half that of the other.

The intensity, I \mathrm{I} , is proportional to the slit width.

This gives us: I1=I0,I2=2I0. \begin{align*} \mathrm{I}_1 &= \mathrm{I}_0, \\ \mathrm{I}_2 &= 2 \mathrm{I}_0. \end{align*} The maximum intensity, Imax \mathrm{I}_{\max} , occurs when the amplitudes add constructively: Imax=(I1+I2)2. \mathrm{I}_{\max} = \left(\sqrt{\mathrm{I}_1} + \sqrt{\mathrm{I}_2}\right)^2. The minimum intensity, Imin \mathrm{I}_{\min} , occurs when the amplitudes interfere destructively: Imin=(I1I2)2. \mathrm{I}_{\min} = \left(\sqrt{\mathrm{I}_1} - \sqrt{\mathrm{I}_2}\right)^2. Now, using I1=I0 \mathrm{I}_1 = \mathrm{I}_0 and I2=2I0 \mathrm{I}_2 = 2 \mathrm{I}_0 , we find: ImaxImin=(2+1)2(21)2=3+22322. \dfrac{\mathrm{I}_{\max}}{\mathrm{I}_{\min}} = \dfrac{(\sqrt{2} + 1)^2}{(\sqrt{2} - 1)^2} = \dfrac{3 + 2\sqrt{2}}{3 - 2\sqrt{2}}.

Q55
A monochromatic light of frequency 5×1014 Hz5 \times 10^{14} \mathrm{~Hz} travelling through air, is incident on a medium of refractive index ' 2 '. Wavelength of the refracted light will be :
A 400 nm
B 300 nm
C 600 nm
D 500 nm
Correct Answer
Option B
Solution

To find the wavelength of the refracted light in a medium with a refractive index of 2, we can use the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and the speed of light.

The frequency (ff) of the light remains the same when it enters the medium.

The formula relating frequency, wavelength, and velocity is: v=fλ v = f \lambda Where: v v is the speed of light in the medium, f f is the frequency of the light, λ \lambda is the wavelength of the light.

The wavelength of light in the medium (λmedium\lambda_{\text{medium}}) can be found using the refractive index (μ\mu) and the wavelength in a vacuum (λvacuum\lambda_{\text{vacuum}}) as follows: λmedium=λvacuumμ \lambda_{\text{medium}} = \dfrac{\lambda_{\text{vacuum}}}{\mu} Given: Frequency of the light, f=5×1014Hz f = 5 \times 10^{14} \, \text{Hz} Speed of light in a vacuum, vvacuum=3×108m/s v_{\text{vacuum}} = 3 \times 10^{8} \, \text{m/s} Refractive index of the medium, μ=2 \mu = 2 First, calculate λvacuum\lambda_{\text{vacuum}}: λvacuum=vvacuumf=3×1085×1014 \lambda_{\text{vacuum}} = \dfrac{v_{\text{vacuum}}}{f} = \dfrac{3 \times 10^{8}}{5 \times 10^{14}} Now calculate λmedium\lambda_{\text{medium}}: λmedium=λvacuum2=3×1082×5×1014 \lambda_{\text{medium}} = \dfrac{\lambda_{\text{vacuum}}}{2} = \dfrac{3 \times 10^{8}}{2 \times 5 \times 10^{14}} λmedium=0.3×106m \lambda_{\text{medium}} = 0.3 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{m} Converting to nanometers: 0.3×106m=300nm 0.3 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{m} = 300 \, \text{nm} Therefore, the wavelength of the refracted light in the medium is 300 nm.

Q56
In Young’s double slit experiment, the distance between slits and the screen is 1.0 m and monochromatic light of 600 nm is being used. A person standing near the slits is looking at the fringe pattern. When the separation between the slits is varied, the interference pattern disappears for a particular distance d0 between the slits. If the angular resolution of the eye is (160)o({{{1}} \over {60}})^o, the value of d0 is close to :
A 1 mm
B 2 mm
C 4 mm
D 3 mm
Correct Answer
Option B
Solution

We know, Fringe width, β\beta =

λDd0{{\lambda D} \over {{d_0}}}

From image, θ\theta =

βD{\beta \over D}

\Rightarrow θ\theta =

λd0{\lambda \over {{d_0}}}

\Rightarrow d0 =

λθ{\lambda \over \theta }

=

600×109160×π180{{600 \times {{10}^{ - 9}}} \over {{1 \over {60}} \times {\pi \over {180}}}}

= 2.06 ×\times 10-3

\simeq

2 mm

Q57
Two stars are 10 light years away from the earth. They are seen through a telescope of objective diameter 30 cm. The wavelength of light is 600 nm. To see the stars just resolved by the telescope, the minimum distance between them should be (1 light year = 9.46 × \times 1015 m) of the order of :
A 106 km
B 108 km
C 1011 km
D 1010 km
Correct Answer
Option B
Solution

The limit of resolution of a telescope,

Δ\Delta

θ\theta =

1.22λD{{1.22\,\,\lambda } \over D}

=

lR{l \over R}

\therefore

ll

=

1.22λRD{{1.22\,\,\lambda R} \over D}

=

1.22×6×107×10×9.46×101530×102{{1.22 \times 6 \times {{10}^{ - 7}} \times 10 \times 9.46 \times 10{}^{15}} \over {30 \times {{10}^{ - 2}}}}

= 2.31 ×\times 108 km

Q58
In a Young's double slit experiment, the slits are placed 0.320 mm apart. Light of wavelength λ\lambda = 500 nm is incident on the slits. The total number of bright fringes that are observed in the angular range - 30o \le θ\theta \le 30o is :
A 640
B 320
C 321
D 641
Correct Answer
Option D
Solution

We know, path difference, d sinθ\theta = nλ\lambda here n = no of bright fringer in the angle here given d = 0.32 ×\times 10-3 m λ\lambda = 500 ×\times 10-9 m \therefore 0.32 ×\times 10-3 sin30o = n ×\times 500 ×\times 10-9 \Rightarrow n = 320 Total number of maxima in the range - 30o θ\theta \le 30o is = 320 ×\times 2 + 1 = 641

Q59
In a double slit experiment, when a thin film of thickness t having refractive index μ\mu . is introduced in front of one of the slits, the maximum at the centre of the fringe pattern shifts by one fringe width. The value of t is (λ\lambda is the wavelength of the light used) :
A λ2(μ1){\lambda \over {2\left( {\mu - 1} \right)}}
B λ(2μ1){\lambda \over {\left( {2\mu - 1} \right)}}
C 2λ(μ1){{2\lambda } \over {\left( {\mu - 1} \right)}}
D λ(μ1){\lambda \over {\left( {\mu - 1} \right)}}
Correct Answer
Option D
Solution

As we know, Path difference introduced by thin film,

Δ=(μ1)t\Delta=(\mu-1) t

.......(i) and if fringe pattern shifts by one frings width, then path difference,

Δ=1×λ=λ\Delta=1 \times \lambda=\lambda

.......(ii) So, from Eqs. (i) and (ii), we get

(μ1)t=λ(\mu-1) t=\lambda

\Rightarrow

t=λμ1t=\frac{\lambda}{\mu-1}
Q60
With what speed should a galaxy move outward with respect to earth so that the sodium-D line at wavelength 5890 Ao\mathop A\limits^o is observed at 5896 Ao\mathop A\limits^o ?
A 306 km/sec
B 322 km/sec
C 296 km/sec
D 336 km/sec
Correct Answer
Option A
Solution
f=f01+β1βf = {f_0}\sqrt {{{1 + \beta } \over {1 - \beta }}}
β=vc\beta = {v \over c}
ff0=1+β1β{f \over {{f_0}}} = \sqrt {{{1 + \beta } \over {1 - \beta }}}
(1+Δff0)2=(1+β)(1β)1{\left( {1 + {{\Delta f} \over {{f_0}}}} \right)^2} = (1 + \beta ){(1 - \beta )^{ - 1}}

β\beta is small compared to 1

(1+2Δff0)=(1+2β)\left( {1 + {{2\Delta f} \over {{f_0}}}} \right) = (1 + 2\beta )
β=Δff0=vc\beta = {{\Delta f} \over {{f_0}}} = {v \over c}
v=6×c5890=305.6v = 6 \times {c \over {5890}} = 305.6

km/s

Ready for a full JEE mock test? Timed · full syllabus · instant results
Take a Mock Test →