Wave Optics
= 5.9 mm
To find the linear width of the central maximum in a single-slit diffraction pattern, we can use the formula that relates the position of the first minima on either side of the central maximum.
The angle, , at which the first minimum occurs is given by:
Where: is the width of the slit is the wavelength of monochromatic light is the order number of the minimum (for the first minimum, ) In our case, we want to find the position of the first minima to determine the width of the central maximum on the screen.
So we will use and which correspond to the first minima on either side of the central peak.
Given the width of the slit mm, which we need to convert to meters for consistency with the wavelength:
And the wavelength , also converting to meters:
We're using a convex lens of focal length cm to project the pattern onto a screen.
We'll need to convert the focal length to meters as well:
We can calculate the angle needed for the first minima using the approximation of small angles, where :
Now, solve for for the first minimum (m = 1):
Plugging in the values:
Now, linear width of the central maximum on the screen (from -m to m, or -1 to +1) will be twice the distance from the center to the first minimum, which can be found using the focal length of the lens and the angle :
Plugging the focal length and calculated theta:
This means the linear width of the central maximum is 24 mm. Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Intensity, I = 3.3 Wm–3 Area, A = 3 × 10–4 m2 Angular speed, = 31.4 rad/s
=
, in one time period
and
Phase difference =
optical path difference =
y =
n =
=
= 2 Path difference
x = n = 2 632.8 nm = 1265.6 nm = 1.27 m
Let
be intensity of unpolarised light incident on first polaroid.
Intensity of light transmitted from
polaroid
be the angle between
and
polaroid be the angle between
and
polaroid
(as
and
polaroid are crossed)
Intensity from
polaroid
Intensity from
polaroid
will be maximum when
I = I0 cos2
= I0 cos2 cos =
= 71.6o = 90 - 71.6 = 18.4o
For two wavelengths,
and
, the bright fringes coincide when the conditions
are simultaneously satisfied for integers
and
, representing the bright fringe order for each wavelength. Rearranging the equation gives:
Thus, the smallest positive integers that satisfy this ratio are:
This means the first coincidence of the bright fringes occurs at the 5th bright fringe for the 480 nm light.