Work done =
12 J work energy theorem wnet
K.E. 12 Kf 3 Kf = 15 J
Work done =
12 J work energy theorem wnet
K.E. 12 Kf 3 Kf = 15 J
When a body moves under the influence of a constant power, the relationship between displacement and time can be established through the concept of power.
Power (P) is defined as the rate at which work is done, and it can also be expressed in terms of force (F) and velocity (v) as .
For a constant power P and assuming the force acts in the direction of the velocity, we can analyze how displacement (s) changes with time (t).
Since force can also be written as for a constant mass m, this simplifies to , because mass doesn't change with time for most cases.
Integrating force over a distance gives work (W), and power is the rate of doing work, thus we can connect these concepts.
The kinetic energy (K.E) of the body is given by , and the work done by the force is equal to the change in kinetic energy.
Considering power is constant, .
Rearranging terms to focus on velocity and integrating with respect to time will give us a relation involving velocity and time.
For a constant mass system, and using , and knowing that , we rearrange to find the relationship between velocity and time.
Given , we rearrange to .
Integrating both sides where the initial condition is when , we get , solving for gives , so for some constant .
The displacement is obtained by integrating the velocity with respect to time, .
Therefore, the displacement is proportional to .
The correct answer is Option B, .
We know that
Power According to the question, power is constant.
where
constant
where
Assume the amount of fat is used = x kg So total Mechanical energy available through fat =
And work done through lifting up = 10 9.8 1000 = 98000 J
= 98000
= 12.89 10-3 kg
The correct answer is:
Here's why: Conservative vs.
Non-Conservative Forces: Conservative Forces: These are forces for which the work done is independent of the path taken; they only depend on the initial and final positions.
For conservative forces, you can define a potential energy function.
Examples include Coulomb’s force, gravitational force, and the restoring force of a spring.
Non-Conservative Forces: These forces depend on the path taken and usually result in energy dissipation (often as heat).
Friction is a typical example, and hence, it cannot be described solely by a potential energy function.
Example Explanations: Coulomb’s Force: It is a conservative force because the work done in moving a charge in an electric field only depends on the difference in electric potential between two points.
Gravitational Force: It is also conservative.
The potential energy associated with gravitational force is given by gravitational potential energy, for example,
near the Earth’s surface. Restoring Force: For a spring, the force is given by Hooke’s law:
and the corresponding potential energy is
This is a conservative force.
Since friction is a non-conservative force that dissipates energy, it cannot be expressed in terms of potential energy.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option A: Frictional force.
P = const.
We know the work energy theorem,
For first penetration, by applying work energy theorem we get,
For second penetration, by applying work energy theorem we get,
On dividing
by
We know, Total energy = Kinetic energy + Potential energy Potential energy given as
We need to find Kinetic Energy. As Force acting on the particle (F) =
Because of this force particle is having circular motion so it will provide possible centripetal force.
We know kinetic energy of particle, K =
=
As Total energy = Kinetic energy + Potential energy So Total energy =
= 0
m/s = 4.47 m/s
Loss in potential energy gain in kinetic energy
or