Equivalent of KMnO4 = Eq of FeC2O4 + Eq of Fe2(C2O4)3 + FeSO4 moles of KMnO4 5 = 3 1 + 6 1 + 1 1 moles of KMnO4 =
= 2
Equivalent of KMnO4 = Eq of FeC2O4 + Eq of Fe2(C2O4)3 + FeSO4 moles of KMnO4 5 = 3 1 + 6 1 + 1 1 moles of KMnO4 =
= 2
In the given reactions:
In the first reaction with iodine (), thiosulfate () acts as a reducing agent, converting to , while it is itself oxidized to .
This indicates that iodine is acting as an oxidant (oxidizing agent), getting reduced in the process.
In the second reaction with bromine (), thiosulfate is oxidized more extensively, being converted all the way to sulfate (), with hydrogen ions () and bromide ions () also produced.
This shows that bromine acts as a stronger oxidant compared to iodine, as it promotes a complete oxidation of to .
Given these observations, the correct option that justifies the dual behavior of thiosulfate reacting with iodine and bromine differently is: Option C: Bromine is a stronger oxidant than iodine This statement correctly explains why thiosulfate is oxidized to in the presence of iodine, and to in the presence of bromine.
Bromine's stronger oxidizing ability leads to a more complete oxidation of thiosulfate compared to the oxidation by iodine.
Match the with & \mathrm{CH}_{4(\mathrm{~g})}+2 \mathrm{O}_{2(\mathrm{~g})} \xrightarrow{\Delta} \mathrm{CO}_{2(\mathrm{~g})} \\ & +2 \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}_{(\mathrm{l})}\end{aligned}$
| List - I | List - II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (B) | (I) | Disproportionation reaction | |
| (C) | (II) | Combination reaction | |
| (D) | (III) | Decomposition reaction | |
| () | (IV) | Displacement reaction | |
(A) Combustion of hydrocarbon (B) Decomposition into gaseous product.
(C) Displacement of ' ' by ' Ca ' atom.
(D) Disproportionation of into and oxidation states.
The reaction between sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and oxalic acid (H2C2O4) is as follows :
We can see that 1 mole of oxalic acid () reacts with 2 moles of sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
Given that 50 mL of 0.5 M oxalic acid is needed to neutralize the sodium hydroxide, we can find the number of moles of oxalic acid that reacted :
Since 1 mole of reacts with 2 moles of , the number of moles of in 25 mL solution would be twice that of :
Now, to find the mass of NaOH, we multiply the number of moles by the molar mass of NaOH (40 g/mol) :
However, the question asks for the amount of in 50 mL of the given solution.
Since we've found the amount in 25 mL, we just need to double our result to find the amount in 50 mL :
So, the correct answer is Option B : 4 g.
NaH is a strong H– (hydride) donor.
Hence cannot be used as an oxidising agent.
In Pyridine, the lone pair of ‘N’ is localised, makes it basic.
When a salt reacts with
and concentrated
, the type of gas evolved depends on the anion present in the salt.
In this case, a greenish yellow gas is evolved, which indicates the formation of chlorine gas (
).
gas is greenish-yellow in color and is typically produced from halide salts (namely chlorides, bromides, or iodides) when they are oxidized.
Among the given options, we need to identify a salt that contains a halide which can produce
upon reaction with
and concentrated
. Option A (
) contains chloride ions, and when heated with
and concentrated
, it can undergo a redox reaction where the chloride ions are oxidized to
gas. The corresponding reaction can be represented as follows:
Option B (
) contains iodide ions, which would lead to the liberation of iodine or
, not a greenish yellow gas. Option C (
) contains nitrate ions and does not produce a halogen gas upon reaction with
and
. Option D (
) contains bromide ions which would lead to the formation of bromine (
), a reddish-brown gas, not greenish yellow. Therefore, the correct answer is Option A (
), since it is the salt that can produce a greenish yellow gas (
) when reacted with
and concentrated
.
A disproportionation reaction is a chemical reaction in which a single substance is simultaneously reduced and oxidized, forming two different products.
To identify disproportionation reactions, one should look for a specified element in the reactant that gains electrons (reduction) and for the same element that lose electrons (oxidation).
Here's an analysis of each reaction : (A) Here, copper (Cu) is in the +1 oxidation state and forms two products, where it is oxidized to the +2 state in and reduced to the 0 state in Cu.
This is a classic example of disproportionation.
So, (A) is true for disproportionation.
(B) In this reaction, (where Mn is in +6 oxidation state) is converted into (where Mn is in +7 oxidation state, oxidation has occurred) and (where Mn is in +4 oxidation state, reduction has occurred).
Here, again, we have the same element, manganese (Mn), undergoing both reduction and oxidation.
Hence, (B) is also a disproportionation reaction.
(C) For the reaction with potassium permanganate, , manganese starts in the +7 oxidation state.
It forms where Mn is in +6 state (reduction) and where Mn is in +4 state (further reduction), but no increase in oxidation state of manganese is observed.
Instead, oxygen is released, so the manganese is not being oxidized in any of its products; it is only reduced twice.
This is not a disproportionation reaction because the same element should be undergoing both oxidation and reduction, which is not the case here.
Hence, (C) is not a disproportionation reaction.
(D) In this reaction, the ion (where Mn is at +7 oxidation state) and ion (where Mn is at +2 oxidation state) react to form (where Mn is at +4 oxidation state).
This reaction is not a case of disproportionation; it is a comproportionation or synproportionation reaction, where two species with the same element in different oxidation states produce a product with the element at an intermediate oxidation state.
Therefore, the disproportionation reactions among the given choices are: (A) (B) Option A would be the correct choice: (A), (B).
$
The reducing agent loses electron during redox reaction i.e. oxidises itself.